La Carta de la Bolsa

Enviar por Email:
Loomis Sayles: Emergentes ganadores y perdedores en la primera parte de 2015
De (correo electrónico): Su nombre: Para (correo elctrónico): Asunto: Mensaje:
    <strong>Artículo publicado en <a href="http://www.lacartadelbolsa.com">La Carta de la Bolsa</a> el Domingo, 26 de Abril en la sección: Articulos</strong>
    <h3 class="titulo_articulo">Loomis Sayles: Emergentes ganadores y perdedores en la primera parte de 2015</h3>
    Redacción
    <p><img alt="" class="ilustraciones" src="http://lacartadelabolsa.com/images/ilustraciones/gg.jpg" style="height:80px; width:100px" />2015 kicked off with a rocky start for emerging markets: pending US rate hikes, falling commodity prices, quantitative easing in Europe, and idiosyncratic country risks all soured investor sentiment and caused the US dollar to soar. This led to substantial weakness in emerging market (EM) foreign exchange, pummeling US-based investors in many local currency bond markets. Despite that pain, EM credit performed well, and along with EM sovereign debt, posted positive gains.</p>

<p>EM hard currency debt remains supported by central bank policy which continues to be accommodative overall. </p>

<p>In the US, dovish Fed policy has remained constructive for EM, with Yellen’s comments in March signaling gradual Fed tightening, which in turn, has encouraged investor risk-taking<br />
In Europe, the aggressive QE bond buying program out of the European Central Bank has pushed euro zone yields down, increasing the attractiveness of EM debt<br />
The global disinflationary environment, fueled by sluggish growth and low oil prices, has also been supportive of EM credit, allowing central banks to cut rates or delay hikes.</p>
    <p><strong>Currency</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Lafferty-GBI-EM-Flags-4-15-15" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ad04113e64&view=fimg&th=14ceaaf1151867e6&attid=0.6&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ-DideAcwPyqtPGs0Dtw0Zg4DdM3qEizBEqoeGvxngrI0AKhfhXGTmVq3Gv4oZ68pANC7pcENczjOQHGTUjap8uymcVS0RigKHOubiXy_THTZBaoMpcigMWGj8&sz=w218-h506&ats=1429883633447&rm=14ceaaf1151867e6&zw&atsh=1" style="float:left; height:253px; width:109px" />The <strong>JP Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Index</strong> was down -3.96% for Q1 2015. The currency component of the index was down -6.33%, negating all gains made in the local bond markets, which broadly rose 2.53%. </p>

<p><strong>Brazil </strong>was hit hardest in the first quarter, down -15.33%. It was the Brazilian real’s precipitous fall, -17%, that fueled underperformance. Increasing lack of confidence in the Rousseff administration’s involvement in the Petrobras corruption scandal, coupled with a stagnant economy, led investors to flee the currency.<br />
<br />
Another major underperformer was <strong>Turkey</strong>, down -9.59%. The country’s weak performance was driven entirely by a decline in the lira, down -10.11%. The lira fell over concerns as to the autonomy of its central bank, as it faces considerable political pressure from Turkey’s President, Recep Erdogan.<br />
<br />
Notably, <strong>Russia</strong> made a strong recovery in Q1, up 15.52%. During Q1, the ruble returned 4.38% and bonds posted double-digit gains, up 11.91%. The stabilization of oil prices, reduced geopolitical concerns over the conflict with Ukraine, and an oversold market fueled the country’s first-quarter rebound. </p>

<p> </p>

<p><strong>Sovereign USD Debt</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Lafferty-Sovereign-Debt-Bench-4-15-15" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ad04113e64&view=fimg&th=14ceaaf1151867e6&attid=0.7&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ9pn0WCpOqboABxKxxQqtOe7KLaLq3Ah_9lfsvm6R2LzMwXCoIX3T7eQc9k4Ut0RmCgLM5jxU_Pdy8TnewBvodVa4h2icm3Q990UgbrUl7fpnh-oM8CvY58FyA&sz=w218-h470&ats=1429883633448&rm=14ceaaf1151867e6&zw&atsh=1" style="float:left; height:235px; width:109px" /><strong>The JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (EMBIG) </strong>closed up 2.06% for the first quarter. We continue to see a divergence in returns between the investment grade and high yield segments, with the higher=quality component of the index returning 2.72% and the high yield segment returning .24%. The decline in US interest rates during Q1 favored the higher-quality, longer-duration investment grade segment and was the largest driver of performance.</p>

<p>Bucking the trend was <strong>Russia</strong>, up 11.21% after its downgrade and precipitous fall in late 2014. Positive headlines on Ukraine peace talks and a stabilization of energy prices offered relief to the oversold market. <br />
<br />
<strong>Nigeria</strong>, a country beaten down by 2014’s petro plunge, made positive gains in Q1 closing up 2.85%. Although concerns over political instability and oil prices continue to stress the market, Nigerian bonds rebounded leading up to its presidential election, which marked the first peaceful transition of power from one elected official to another in the country’s history.</p>

<p>The worst performer for the quarter was <strong>Ukraine,</strong> down -29.70%. Investor concerns mounted over the nation’s foreign debt restructuring plan. At the end of March, Ukrainian debt traded around 40 cents to the dollar, signaling a sizable cut in principal and reduction in coupon payments.</p>

<p> </p>

<p><strong>Emerging USD Corporate Debt</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Lafferty-Emerging-USD-Corp-Debt-Bench-4-15-15" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ad04113e64&view=fimg&th=14ceaaf1151867e6&attid=0.8&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ9-YTqevvwdity_DNRP6LzMSf75MlwWPGMlBBrSOxggp84yUfeE4qhFUm7366v5aGj2ALyYxvK_5ZmmycjhFYK7LL0xZZJQLRk5XPMYchbxxbIce72BvjOXrCM&sz=w216-h258&ats=1429883633449&rm=14ceaaf1151867e6&zw&atsh=1" style="float:left; height:129px; width:108px" />The <strong>JP Morgan Corporate Emerging Bond Index (CEMBI)</strong> closed up 2.36% for the first quarter, with both the investment grade and high yield components posting strong results, 2.39% and 2.29%, respectively.</p>

<p><strong>Russia</strong> once again led the pack in quarterly gains, returning 12.41%. While economists fear Russia’s economy will slip into recession due to low oil prices and sanctions, attractive valuations and low debt levels for the recently downgraded country spurred demand. The Russian recovery largely drove outperformance of the metals and mining sector, up 3.61%, making it the top sector in the index.</p>

<p> </p>

<p><strong>Equities</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Lafferty-EM-Equities-Bench-4-15-15" src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=ad04113e64&view=fimg&th=14ceaaf1151867e6&attid=0.9&disp=emb&attbid=ANGjdJ8l3m4SdhFe5-aH80wXjzY_BJLbO6o3hJg_0gvHvDpJvVx8VsRBTGCsz1rU7-7fSJjJv6oVs8Gdtak_iCWtZdfM1NQyCSyFKe8Pr3FrphiN3byqYof5t6c5gvM&sz=w218-h266&ats=1429883633449&rm=14ceaaf1151867e6&zw&atsh=1" style="float:left; height:133px; width:109px" /><strong>The MSCI Emerging Markets Index</strong> returned 2.22% at the end of the first quarter.</p>

<p><strong>China</strong> continues to be the top-performing EM equity market, with the Shanghai Composite returning 15.99% in US dollar terms. While foreign investors continue to question China’s growth prospects, local investors confident of government stimulus to achieve targets continue to pour money into the system. China’s large index weighting masked many falling markets in EM for the quarter, particularly European and Latin markets where weak currencies translated into losses for US dollar investors.</p>

<p> </p>

<p><strong>2015 Outlook</strong></p>

<p>The remainder of 2015 will likely be categorized by differentiation in emerging markets. Investor fear over Fed rate hikes, US dollar strength and low oil prices will likely continue to create performance-wide dispersion of return. But keep in mind—EM tides can turn quickly, themes can reverse and yesterday’s losers can be tomorrow’s winners. </p>
    https://lacartadelabolsa.com/index.php/237836
[Volver]
Otros artículos en La Carta
Lo más leído hoy en La Carta